| Series of 28 2008 100 x 100 cm Limited Edition of 1 + 1AP LAMDA PRINT |
|
Artist Statement: The aspect of colour Colour photography distils the colours of a single view in a fraction of a second the time it takes for a shutter to open and close. Although these colours are constantly visible to us whilst looking at the endlessly rich world of imagery surrounding us, they always remain surface and thus attribute as well as bearer of meaning for the photographed forms in question. These images dissolve this correlation, without destroying it. The colours as such are made visible, without disputing their origin. This parallel perceptivity of motif and colour defines the viewer`s pleasure. The
aspect of geometry |
|
Translated by Jane Curlfield Take a look at your question and you can see how less we still know about color these days. Everyone has his one opinion, one teacher tells his pupils some nonsense about standing waves of different frequencies, but most of them keep their mouth shut, because they know, that they have nothing to tell. So thats because everyone is free to have his own little private view of this matter. I like the idea, that colors are something by their own, not attributes of something third. Try to think about this red in the corner over there, that has the attribute to be a fire extinguisher, maybe you see the point. Well, then you don’t get it wrong. I’m a lttle bit upset by the arrogance of our culture, facing it’s own hollowness. Color is just a small detail. We know as less about color as we do about gravity or light for example. Stupefaction is growing massively around us. There is no consensus in many questions, which could and should be a good educational background for those, growing towards our future. Take the fact of death for example, or maybe a bit more innocent: the fact of sleep. What do you know about sleep? Not much like most of us, i guess. The precious few i know was written between 1909 and 1912 and it happens quiet rarely, that i meet someone who takes that ignorance as a deficit. I like your formulation. These colors are coming to me, because i give them a playground and i feel happy looking at them. Most of the times a color is captivated to the surface of an object and this fact is frozen in a photography. I love to work with old photos, because these colors where locked for such a long time. If you release them from the leash, they really start dancing. Colors are coding times and therefore collective emotions – or say memories, which are captivated in these times. I’m very nostalgic. If you suddenly see an ocean of colors from the early 60ies, that are taken in this incredible african light, then you feel a wave of emotions, even if you haven’t experienced that time. Past is always a place for desire. I think places and times are approaching me the same way then colors. Since eight months i’m living in Johannesburg, thats why pictures from africa are closer to me then pictures from let’s say scandinavia. Some people are asking me, why i came here and, to be honest: i don’t know. There are dates i like more then others, for example 1956. 1962 is just another one and it is the year of my birth. It’s not that important, neither the date nor the place – the colors are important. The oldest pictures i worked with were colour slides fron the concentration camp Treblinka 1944, my favorite pictures from the Colours of the past series are photos from a schoolbook for car mechanics from 1972. In modern medicine there is a development to something they call diagnostic imaging since the invention of x-rays. Today they send magnetic waves through your body and the resulting resonances were turned to threedimensional computer models. These models were digital dyed and then transformed back to images. On these pictures a medicine is able to observe defects. Since we live in a digital age, there are quite a few new technics, hardware and software, i’m playing with that. Yes, but in Munich there was another focus. You know, we live in a
world created from our imagination, which is very closed to the real
space through our senses. For example we are sitting in a room and we
both have a result from the picture of this room in our mind. Very different
results, little different pictures, but the same room. I think we are
in the beginning of a change, that which will brake this connection
between real world and imagination. Hollywood is a symptom of that.
There have been times where, let’s say 10% of my communication
with friends was about adventures i had throught characters on screen
in the cinema. These were experiences, real emotions, that i had without
moving my body through real space. I try to find images for this kind
of artificial life that happens every night when you sleep and dream
and who knows what happens when you sleep without dreaming. It’s
easy to locate your mind in a dream, but where is your mind in dreamless
sleep? Since half a year i’m working with photos that are made
with a scanner, not a camera. These pictures are without room, they
are only showing surfaces. But if through the working process a visual
space is emerging in the resulting picture, then this space has a peculiar
strangeness, that refers to that quesion for me. This is whats happening
in the bodyscan series in Munich.
|
|
|